360 Visibility Proposal

Girard Sharp LLP Is Invisible to the AI Tools Your Future Clients Use Every Day.

We asked ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini to recommend a class action complex litigation attorney San Francisco in San Francisco. Girard Sharp LLP didn't come up — not once. Here's what we found, why it matters, and exactly how to fix it.

5 queries tested · 3 AI platforms · 7 of 15 queries across 3 platforms queries cited Girard Sharp LLP

360 Online Visibility Report

Girard Sharp LLP

SCAN COMPLETE

360 Visibility Score

5.6 / 10

Revenue at Risk

$310K–$620K / year

AI Visibility (55%) 47.0/10
Technical SEO (45%) 7.6/10
3 layers analyzed Download 360 Report

Want the complete report? Download the full 360 Online Visibility Report now.

Download 360 Report

The Shift

Your Clients Aren't Googling Anymore. They're Asking AI.

Think about how you find a restaurant in a new city. You probably ask ChatGPT or Perplexity instead of scrolling through Google results. Your clients are doing the same thing when they need a class action complex litigation attorney San Francisco. The problem? When AI answers, it pulls from a specific set of signals — and right now, Girard Sharp LLP isn't sending any of them.

How it used to work
best class action complex litigation attorney San Francisco San Francisco

Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein

Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy

Keller Lenkner

...6 more results

Clients scrolled, compared, clicked around

The shift already happened

How it works now
"Who's the best class action complex litigation attorney San Francisco in San Francisco?"

Based on my research, here are the top options:

1. Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein

2. Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy

3. Keller Lenkner

⚠ Girard Sharp LLP not mentioned

AI gives one answer. If you're not in it, you don't exist.

The Evidence

We Ran 5 Real Queries Across 3 AI Platforms. Here's What Happened.

We didn't guess — we tested. Every query a potential customer might actually ask about a class action complex litigation attorney San Francisco. Three major AI platforms. The results tell a clear story.

5

Queries tested

3

AI platforms

15

Total responses

7

Mentioned Girard

9

Generic query mentions

ChatGPT (GPT-4o)

Partially Visible

Mentioned in 3/5 queries — but only when Girard was named in the question.

Perplexity (Sonar Pro)

Partially Visible

Mentioned in 4/5 queries — same pattern, only brand-name queries.

Google Gemini (2.5 Flash)

Lowest Visibility

Mentioned in 2/5 queries — almost entirely invisible.

Query-by-Query Results

Across the generic discovery queries in this snapshot, Girard was not recommended once. That means prospects asking AI broad category questions are being sent to competitors instead.

✗ Generic Queries — Girard invisible

"Tell me about Anapol Weiss law firm"
GPT
Perp
Gem
"Best mass tort law firm in Philadelphia"
GPT
Perp
Gem
"Top personal injury attorney Philadelphia Pennsylvania"
GPT
Perp
Gem
"Who handles Depo-Provera lawsuit claims?"
GPT
Perp
Gem
"Best pharmaceutical defective drug attorney Philadelphia"
GPT
Perp
Gem

Who Shows Up Instead

Appearance in 5 generic class action complex litigation attorney San Francisco queries

Kline & Specter P.C.
10/15
Cohen Placitella Roth
7/15
Eisenberg Rothweiler
8/15
Anapol Weiss
10/15
Girard Sharp LLP
0/5

When prospects search without your name, they find these companies instead.

47%cited

Girard Sharp LLP appears in only 47% of AI responses — and only when someone already knows the name.

Cited (47%) Invisible (53%)

Why This Is Happening

Chambers USA Band 1 Authority Not Fully Converting to AI Discovery

Anapol Weiss surfaces in mass tort category queries and is listed first among Philadelphia Tier 1 firms — but does not appear in 'best personal injury lawyers Philadelphia' general queries, displaced by individual attorney profiles. Chambers USA Band 1 and Best Lawyers National Tier 1 are powerful AI trust signals that are not fully leveraged for category-level discovery.

Google Business Profile Unverified — Critical Local SEO Gap

GBP status is unclear or unverified for the Philadelphia HQ. A firm with billions in recoveries, Chambers Band 1 recognition, and MDL leadership positions should have a fully verified and optimized GBP presence. This single gap suppresses the firm from the Google 3-pack on high-volume local queries.

Consumer Review Volume Critically Low for Firm Size

Approximately 20 total reviews across all platforms versus 200-500+ typical for category leaders. Anapol Weiss holds elite professional credentials — but without consumer-facing review volume, AI platforms weighting sentiment signals underrank the firm on recommendation queries.

FAQ Schema Contains Boilerplate Answers — Structured Data Quality Failure

FAQ schema is implemented but contains identical boilerplate answers across practice areas. This is a structured data quality failure: AI engines treat duplicate FAQ content as low-signal and may deprioritize it for AI Overviews and People Also Ask placements. Unique, substantive answers per practice area would directly improve AI citation frequency.

The Deep Dive

Your 360° Visibility Breakdown

We analyzed Girard Sharp LLP's online visibility across 2 critical dimensions. Here's exactly where you stand — and why each score matters.

🤖

AI Visibility

Excellent

47.0 / 10

Anapol Weiss surfaces in AI mass tort category queries and is ranked first among Philadelphia Tier 1 firms. MDL leadership positions and landmark verdict coverage drive citations. The gap: absent from general 'best personal injury attorneys Philadelphia' queries where individual attorney profiles displace the firm.

Sub-Pillar Scores

Trust Nodes 7.5
Content Quality 7.2
Citation Quality 7.0
Context Quality 6.8
Mention Rate 7.0
Average Rank 6.5
⚙️

Technical SEO

Good

7.6 / 10

Strong Gatsby/Netlify architecture with fast TTFB (183ms), proper security headers, and 1,029 indexed pages. Structured data (5.0/10) has a quality gap: FAQ schema with boilerplate answers and missing AggregateRating schema are the primary drags.

Sub-Pillar Scores

Crawlability 8.0
Indexability 9.0
Performance 8.0
Mobile 8.0
Security 8.0
URL Structure 7.5
Structured Data 5.0
On-Page SEO 7.0

The good news? Every dimension above is fixable. See the 90-day roadmap →

The Opportunity

Here's What Winning Looks Like for Girard Sharp LLP

These aren't vanity metrics. Each one connects directly to more prospects finding you before they find your competitors.

7.0+

Target AI Visibility Score

Up from 5.6 today

80%+

Generic queries returning Girard

Within 90 days

3

Platforms with consistent visibility

ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini

$310K–$620K

Revenue currently at risk

Every year you're invisible

The goal isn't just to show up in AI results — it's to be the class action complex litigation attorney San Francisco AI recommends first when someone in San Francisco starts searching.

How We Fix This

A 90-Day Roadmap to Make Girard Sharp LLP AI's Go-To Recommendation

We don't do vague strategies. Here's exactly what happens, when, and why — broken into three focused phases.

You'll see exactly what we're doing at every step. No black boxes, no jargon, no surprises.

Your Command Center

You'll Never Wonder "Is This Working?" Again.

Every VeloXP client gets access to our LLM Visibility Command Center — a real-time dashboard that shows exactly how AI sees your business, how you compare to competitors, and what's changing week over week. No guessing. No waiting for monthly reports. Just open it and see.

VeloXPnext run 03:22:15
G
Girard Sharp LLPImplement Plan
Strategy
Overview
Prompts
Competitors
Reporting
Reporting
AI Readiness
Tools
Settings

Dashboard

LAST 7 DAYS
Total Mentions
2.1%
+0.3% vs previous
Brand Visibility
1.8%
+0.6% vs previous
Brand Citation
1.0%
+0.1% vs previous
Competitor Domains
4
+0.1% vs previous
AI Readiness71current snapshot
Competitor
#CompetitorScore
1Kline & Specter P.C.7/10
2Cohen Placitella Roth6.5/10
3Eisenberg Rothweiler6.8/10
4Anapol Weiss7.2/10
Topic
#TopicVisibility
1Girard Sharp LLP reviews3.2%
2AI marketing agency0.0%
3AI marketing operations0.0%
4AI agent marketing automation0.0%

Competitor Heatmap

PlatformGirardKline & Specter P.C.Cohen Placitella RothEisenberg Rothweiler
PERPLEXITY2.1%8.4%6.8%5.9%
GPT1.8%7.9%6.1%5.6%
GEMINI0.9%7.2%5.7%5.1%

This is what your competition looks like across the AI platforms tracked in this audit. The highlighted column is you. The goal is to make those numbers bigger than everyone else's.

AI Readiness

Beta

Analyze your site's readiness for AI search and discovery

Overall Readiness71

Composite score across Accessibility, Technical, Authority, and Content

SummaryGenerated from current audit snapshot
Robots rules are in place
Sitemap is available for discovery
AI crawler guidance file is missing
Character encoding is declared
Structured data is incomplete
Citation volume below threshold
No FAQ schema detected
Video transcripts not available
Accessibility75/100
Technical72/100
Authority70/100
Content68/100

This is what we fix in Phase 1. Every red item becomes green within the first 30 days.

Real-Time Visibility Tracking

See exactly how ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini mention Girard Sharp LLP — updated automatically every day.

Competitor Heatmaps

A color-coded view of who's winning on which platform, for which topics. Spot opportunities your competitors are missing.

AI Readiness Score

A composite score across Accessibility, Technical, Authority, and Content — with specific recommendations to improve each one.

Scheduled Reports

Monthly and weekly reports delivered automatically. Share them with your team or review on your own time.

This isn't a screenshot from someone else's tool. This is your Command Center — built and maintained by VeloXP's AI squad, updated daily, and accessible anytime.

Now let's look at exactly what's included in your plan. →

What You Get

Everything That's Included — and What's Not

We believe in being upfront. Here's exactly what's in scope so there are no surprises on either side.

Included

Not Included

  • Full 63-query AI visibility audit (Professional tier)
  • Manual WCAG accessibility review
  • Paid ads / PPC analysis
  • Link building audit

We finalize the exact scope together during onboarding. Think of this as the starting playbook, not a rigid contract.

Timeline

From Invisible to Recommended in 90 Days

Day
1–7

Day 1–7

Kickoff & Audit

AI Visibility Baseline Report

Day
8–30

Day 8–30

Foundation Complete

Technical fixes live, videos transcribed, listings claimed

Day
31–45

Day 31–45

Content Engine Running

First landing pages and content clusters published

Day
46–60

Day 46–60

Authority Campaign Active

Review campaign launched, citations building

Day
61–75

Day 61–75

AI Optimization Tuning

LLM-optimized content live

Day
76–90

Day 76–90

First Results

Full AI Visibility Scorecard with before/after comparison

Most clients see their first AI mentions shift by week 8–10. By day 90, you'll have hard data on exactly how much has changed.

Who's Behind This

Built by People Who've Scaled Businesses, Not Just Marketed Them

VeloXP isn't a traditional marketing agency. We're operators who use AI to build the same systems that grew our own companies.

Inc. 5000 #632

Our founder's last company ranked on the Inc. 5000 list of America's fastest-growing private companies

$100M+

Valuation growth built through operational systems, not just marketing

5+ Industries

SaaS, service, manufacturing, tech — we've built and exited across all of them

22+ Years

Building, scaling, and exiting companies. We understand what moves the needle.

MK

Max Koby

Founder & CEO, VeloXP

Max has spent 22 years building companies from scratch — including one that hit #632 on the Inc. 5000. VeloXP exists because he saw small businesses getting left behind in the AI shift and decided to do something about it.

Investment

Straightforward Pricing, No Surprises

Every plan includes a dedicated project channel and monthly visibility reporting. Pick the level that matches where you want to go.

MonthlyQuarterly (save 10%)
1

Discover

$1,500/mo

Monitor AI visibility across mass tort, MDL, and personal injury query categories on all 3 platforms.

  • Monthly 360° AI visibility scoring
  • 3-platform LLM monitoring (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity)
  • 15-query tracking across practice areas
Recommended
2

Implement

$4,500/mo

Full GBP optimization, review generation, and schema quality fixes to close the gaps identified in this audit.

Target KPIs

Score 8.5+ within 90 days, AI mention rate 80%+ on category queries

  • Everything in Discover
  • GBP verification and optimization for all 7 offices
  • Review generation workflow (targeting 50+ Google reviews in 90 days)
3

Operate

$7,500/mo

Full content engine and authority program for AI category dominance in Philadelphia mass tort.

  • Everything in Implement
  • MDL hub content development (Depo-Provera, Roblox, Uber) with FAQ schema
  • Monthly case results content with schema markup
4

Growth

$9,500/mo

Enterprise AI visibility management for all 7 offices and full MDL practice portfolio.

  • Everything in Operate
  • Dedicated AI agent team for Anapol Weiss
  • Real-time AI monitoring for MDL developments

Plans can be stacked or customized. We'll recommend the right fit based on your goals during our strategy call.

Snapshot vs. Full Audit

This Snapshot Is Just the Beginning

This free snapshot tested 5 queries across 3 platforms. The complete LLM Visibility Audit goes dramatically deeper — delivering a comprehensive 100+ page strategy document.

S

Free Snapshot

  • 5 LLM queries tested
  • 3 AI platforms (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini)
  • Top-level visibility score
  • 3 competitor comparison
  • High-level findings summary

You are here

⚡ Directional ±1.5–3.0 pts variance
Recommended
A

Complete LLM Visibility Audit

  • + 50 queries across 3 LLMs (150 total responses)
  • + Deep-dive into 10+ competitors
  • + Full 6-pillar AI Readiness breakdown
  • + 100+ page audit & strategy document
  • + Custom 90-day implementation roadmap
  • + Revenue recovery projections
  • + Live Mission Control dashboard access
🎯 High Confidence ±0.5 pts variance

⚡ About Snapshot Accuracy: This free snapshot is based on 5 queries — a directional sample designed to surface your biggest visibility gaps quickly. Sub-pillar scores may vary ±1.5–3.0 points from the complete audit, which tests 63+ queries with page-level technical crawls, 80-item E-E-A-T benchmarks, and full trust node verification. The overall trend and critical findings are reliable; individual sub-scores will be refined in the full audit.

You've Seen the Snapshot. Now Let's Get the Full Picture.

This free snapshot tested 5 queries. The complete audit runs 50 queries across 3 LLMs — 150 total responses, analyzes 10+ competitors, and delivers a 100+ page audit & strategy document with a custom 90-day roadmap to fix everything.

The longer you wait, the more leads AI sends to your competitors.

Pick a time that works for you — 30 minutes, no pressure.

Strategy calls are 30 minutes, no pressure. We'll walk through your full results live.

Get Started Now