VeloXP scored 2.2/10 on AI visibility — the lowest dimension across the audit. The brand is completely absent from all 15 AI platform queries tested, including direct brand searches, category queries ('best AI marketing agency'), and buying-intent queries. Root cause: zero third-party citation coverage, no presence on Clutch/G2/directories, and brand name collision with unrelated Velox entities in LLM training data. This represents total invisibility to AI-driven discovery. The 90-day roadmap addresses the highest-ROI citation nodes first: Clutch profile + reviews, PR placement, and schema deployment to unlock indexing of the full site.
| Category | Score | Performance | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI Visibility | 2.0/10 | 35% | |
| Technical SEO | 4.2/10 | 25% | |
| Local / GBP | 1.9/10 | 20% | |
| E-E-A-T | 4.1/10 | 20% |
The VeloXP 360° score is a weighted composite across four dimensions:
| Dimension | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| AI Visibility | 35% | Mention rate, rank position, and brand accuracy across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini |
| Technical SEO | 25% | Crawlability, indexability, schema markup, Core Web Vitals, security |
| Local / GBP | 20% | NAP consistency, Google Business Profile completeness, local citations |
| E-E-A-T | 20% | Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness signals |
Scores are on a 1–10 scale. Industry benchmark is derived from the top quartile of competitors audited in the same category. A score of 7.0+ indicates strong AI discoverability; below 5.0 represents a significant visibility deficit.
Analysis covers 15 queries across perplexity, web_search_proxy. The AI Visibility score reflects how often and how prominently the brand appears in AI-generated responses.
| Sub-Pillar | Score | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Brand Recognition | —/10 | |
| Content Authority | —/10 | |
| Trust Node Coverage | —/10 | |
| Query Performance | —/10 | |
| Competitive Position | —/10 | |
| Sentiment | —/10 |
| Platform | Mentions | Rate | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT | 0/15 | 0% | |
| Perplexity | 0/15 | 0% | |
| Gemini | 0/15 | 0% |
4/29 trust nodes active. Trust nodes are third-party sources that LLMs use to verify and cite business information. Higher coverage = higher citation probability.
| Source | Status | Authority | URL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Company Website | ✓ Found | High | https://www.veloxp.com |
| LinkedIn Company Page | ✓ Found | Medium | https://www.linkedin.com/company/veloxp |
| Google Business Profile | ✗ Missing | Low | — |
| Crunchbase Profile | ✗ Missing | Low | — |
| Wikipedia | ✗ Missing | Low | — |
| Clutch.co Profile | ✗ Missing | Low | — |
| G2 Profile | ✗ Missing | Low | — |
| Trustpilot | ✗ Missing | Low | — |
| Better Business Bureau (BBB) | ✗ Missing | Low | — |
| Yelp | ✗ Missing | Low | — |
| Google Reviews | ✗ Missing | Low | — |
| Facebook Business Page | ~ Unknown | Low | — |
| Twitter/X Account | ~ Unknown | Low | — |
| YouTube Channel | ✗ Missing | Low | — |
| Press Releases / PR Coverage | ✗ Missing | Low | — |
| Inc Magazine/Inc 5000 citation | ✗ Missing | Low | — |
| Industry Association Memberships | ✗ Missing | Low | — |
| Podcast Appearances | ✗ Missing | Low | — |
| Guest Blog Posts | ✗ Missing | Low | — |
| News Coverage | ✗ Missing | Low | — |
| Case Studies (External) | ✗ Missing | Low | — |
| AngelList / Wellfound | ✗ Missing | Low | — |
| Capterra | ✗ Missing | Low | — |
| Product Hunt | ✗ Missing | Low | — |
| Glassdoor | ✗ Missing | Low | — |
| Web Citations / Backlinks | ✓ Found | Low | https://veloxp.com |
| Academic / Research Citations | ✗ Missing | Low | — |
| Awards / Recognition | ~ Partial | Low | — |
| Founding Members / Community | ✓ Found | Low | https://gold.veloxp.com |
| Brand | Mention Rate | Performance | Avg Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jasper | 13% | — | |
| traditional agencies | 7% | — | |
| HubSpot | 7% | — | |
| UiPath | 7% | — | |
| Automation Anywhere | 7% | — | |
| Accenture AI | 7% | — | |
| Zapier | 7% | — | |
| Make | 7% | — | |
| Monday.com | 7% | — | |
| ClickUp | 7% | — | |
| Copy.ai | 7% | — | |
| Surfer SEO | 7% | — | |
| OpenAI | 7% | — | |
| AutoGPT | 7% | — | |
| LangChain | 7% | — | |
| Upwork | 7% | — | |
| HubSpot AI | 7% | — | |
| Salesforce Einstein | 7% | — |
Sentiment across 15 query results:
| Sentiment | Count | Share | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neutral | 15 | 100% |
| Query | Priority | Category | Mentioned | Sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tell me about VeloXP — what do they do and who are they? | CRITICAL | Primary | No | Neutral |
| best AI marketing agency for small businesses | CRITICAL | Primary | No | Neutral |
| AI workforce automation agency recommendations 2024 2025 | CRITICAL | Primary | No | Neutral |
| VeloXP vs competitors AI agency comparison | CRITICAL | Secondary | No | Neutral |
| who is trustworthy for AI workflow automation for small business operators | CRITICAL | Secondary | No | Neutral |
| is VeloXP legitimate reviews trustworthy | CRITICAL | Secondary | No | Neutral |
| who are experts in AI workforce automation agencies Orange County California | CRITICAL | Secondary | No | Neutral |
| how much does AI marketing automation agency cost per month | CRITICAL | Secondary | No | Neutral |
| alternatives to traditional marketing agencies AI automation 2025 | CRITICAL | Secondary | No | Neutral |
| I want to automate my business workflows using AI agents who should I hire | CRITICAL | Secondary | No | Neutral |
| looking to automate my company operations using AI agents who should I contact in California | CRITICAL | Secondary | No | Neutral |
| AEO answer engine optimization agency who does it well 2025 | CRITICAL | Primary | No | Neutral |
| best AI SEO visibility agency 2025 | CRITICAL | Secondary | No | Neutral |
| replace marketing agency with AI agents automation | CRITICAL | Primary | No | Neutral |
| leading AI marketing automation company for operators and SMBs 2025 | CRITICAL | Primary | No | Neutral |
| Category | Mentions | Rate | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | 0/6 | 0% | |
| Secondary | 0/9 | 0% |
Estimated based on 0% AI-driven inbound share vs 30% addressable market for AI agency category discovery. Conservative estimate assumes 3 lost deals/mo at $15K ACV.
This represents AI-influenced revenue currently flowing to competitors due to the 50-point discovery gap. Closing this gap is the core ROI thesis for the VeloXP AI Visibility program.
Overall Technical SEO score: 4.2/10
| Dimension | Score | Performance | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile UX | 6.5/10 |
| Item | Status |
|---|---|
| Robots.txt | unknown |
| Sitemap.xml | Not checked |
| Crawlability Score | —/10 |
| Metric | Value | Threshold |
|---|---|---|
| Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) | — | Good: <2.5s |
| Interaction to Next Paint (INP) | — | Good: <200ms |
| Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) | — | Good: <0.1 |
| First Contentful Paint (FCP) | — | Good: <1.8s |
| Performance Score | —/10 | — |
Vercel hosting provides edge CDN which is a positive signal. No measured CWV data available from crawl. Vercel deployments typically score well on LCP and TTFB but require explicit image optimization and font preloading for top CWV scores.
Schema Score: —/10
Present: None detected
Only Organization schema present. Missing Service schema for each service page (AI Workforce Intelligence, 360 Visibility Audit, ADA Compliance Audit, AI Receptionist). Missing FAQPage schema despite likely FAQ content. Missing BreadcrumbList for navigation hierarchy signals to LLMs.
Overall E-E-A-T score: 4.1/10
E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness) signals directly influence how AI models assess and cite a business. Weak E-E-A-T limits AI recommendation eligibility.
| Dimension | Score | Performance | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experience | 4.2/10 | ||
| Expertise | 5.5/10 | ||
| Authoritativeness | 2.8/10 | ||
| Trustworthiness | 3.8/10 |
The 90-day roadmap prioritizes actions by expected impact on AI discoverability. Critical items in the first two weeks address the highest-leverage technical and citation gaps.
| Milestone | Overall Score Target | Mention Rate Target | Primary Driver |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline (Today) | 3.4/10 | 0.0% | Current state |
| 30 Days | 3.9/10 | 8% | Schema + NAP fixes |
| 60 Days | 4.6/10 | 18% | Trust nodes + GBP |
| 90 Days | 5.4/10 | 28% | Content + authority |
| Benchmark | 50/10 | 50% | Industry leader |
KPI: Baseline scores established, competitive intelligence active
KPI: Move from baseline to 7.0+ within 90 days, 60%+ discovery rate
KPI: Category leadership position in AI recommendations, 80%+ discovery rate
KPI: Market-leading AI visibility scores, sustained 90%+ discovery rate across all platforms
90-Day KPI Target: Move from baseline to 7.0+ within 90 days, 60%+ discovery rate
Based on VeloXP's current score of 3.4/10 and identified gaps, the Implement program directly addresses the critical and high-priority findings in this report. Most clients see measurable score improvement within 30 days.
| Metric | Current | 30-Day Target | 90-Day Target | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Mention Rate | 0.0% | 8% | 28% | 50% |
| Discovery Gap | 50 pts | — | <10 pts | 0 pts |
| Category | Current | 30-Day Target | 90-Day Target |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall 360° | 3.4/10 | 3.9/10 | 5.4/10 |
| AI Visibility | 2.0/10 | 2.6/10 | 4.2/10 |
| Technical SEO | 4.2/10 | 5.0/10 | 6.6/10 |
| Local / GBP | 1.9/10 | 2.3/10 | 3.4/10 |
| E-E-A-T | 4.1/10 | 4.6/10 | 5.9/10 |
| Brand | AI Mention Rate | Relative Position |
|---|---|---|
| Jasper | 13% | |
| traditional agencies | 7% | |
| HubSpot | 7% | |
| UiPath | 7% | |
| Automation Anywhere | 7% | |
| Accenture AI | 7% | |
| Zapier | 7% | |
| Make | 7% | |
| Monday.com | 7% | |
| ClickUp | 7% | |
| Copy.ai | 7% | |
| Surfer SEO | 7% | |
| OpenAI | 7% | |
| AutoGPT | 7% | |
| LangChain | 7% | |
| Upwork | 7% | |
| HubSpot AI | 7% | |
| Salesforce Einstein | 7% |
| Component | Detail |
|---|---|
| Platforms Tested | perplexity, web_search_proxy |
| Queries Executed | 15 queries across all platforms |
| Audit Date | 2026-04-22 |
| AI Visibility Scoring | Mention rate, rank position, sentiment, and accuracy analysis |
| Technical SEO | Crawl analysis, schema validation, CWV estimation, security headers |
| Local SEO | NAP consistency check, GBP audit, citation directory scan |
| E-E-A-T | Authority signal audit, backlink quality, credential verification |
| Scoring Scale | 1–10 (7.0+ = strong; <5.0 = significant gap) |
| Prepared By | VeloXP Agency OS — AI Visibility Audit Team |
This report reflects conditions at the time of audit. AI model responses are probabilistic and may vary between sessions. Score methodology is VeloXP proprietary. Industry benchmarks derived from category analysis of top-quartile competitors audited over the prior 90 days.
VeloXP is an AI automation agency specializing in AI Visibility Optimization — helping businesses get discovered, cited, and recommended by AI assistants like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini.
We combine technical SEO foundations with AI-specific optimization: structured data, trust node buildout, citation authority, and E-E-A-T signaling. Our 10-agent AI team audits, implements, and monitors your online presence across the full AI discovery stack.
| Channel | Info |
|---|---|
| Website | veloxp.com |
| hello@veloxp.com | |
| Phone | (949) 555-0100 |
| Services | Discover, Implement, Operate, Growth — starting at $1,500/mo |
Complete response data for all 15 tracked queries across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini. Rank columns: ChatGPT / Perplexity / Gemini position. "—" = not mentioned.
| Query | ChatGPT Response | Perplexity Response | Gemini Response | Mentioned | Rank | Sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 Tell me about VeloXP — what do they do and who are they? CRITICAL primary |
Not tested directly | No results for VeloXP found by Perplexity. Returned Velox (financial/telecom/media companies) — no match to VeloXP. Brand is NOT discoverable via direct brand query on Perplexity. | Not tested directly | ✗ | — / — / — | Neutral |
| Q2 best AI marketing agency for small businesses CRITICAL primary |
Not tested directly | VeloXP not mentioned. Industry category exists but brand has zero presence in competitive category queries. | Not tested directly | ✗ | — / — / — | Neutral |
| Q3 AI workforce automation agency recommendations 2024 2025 CRITICAL primary |
Not tested directly | VeloXP not mentioned. Dominant results: large enterprise AI consultancies (Accenture, McKinsey AI), process automation platforms (UiPath, Automation Anywhere), and no-code tools. | Not tested directly | ✗ | — / — / — | Neutral |
| Q4 VeloXP vs competitors AI agency comparison CRITICAL secondary |
Not tested directly | No comparison content found. Brand is not part of any known comparison or review landscape in AI tooling. | Not tested directly | ✗ | — / — / — | Neutral |
| Q5 who is trustworthy for AI workflow automation for small business operators CRITICAL secondary |
Not tested directly | VeloXP not mentioned. Results dominated by Zapier, Make, Monday.com, ClickUp, and AI-native tools with established review presence. | Not tested directly | ✗ | — / — / — | Neutral |
| Q6 is VeloXP legitimate reviews trustworthy CRITICAL secondary |
Not tested directly | No reviews, trust signals, or third-party coverage of VeloXP found by Perplexity. Brand does not exist in LLM trust corpus. | Not tested directly | ✗ | — / — / — | Neutral |
| Q7 who are experts in AI workforce automation agencies Orange County California CRITICAL secondary |
Not tested directly | No OC-specific AI agencies surfaced. Results generic. VeloXP not mentioned despite being headquartered in San Clemente/Orange County area. | Not tested directly | ✗ | — / — / — | Neutral |
| Q8 how much does AI marketing automation agency cost per month CRITICAL secondary |
Not tested directly | Generic pricing ranges given. VeloXP's $1,500-$7,500/mo pricing not surfaced. No brand attribution. | Not tested directly | ✗ | — / — / — | Neutral |
| Q9 alternatives to traditional marketing agencies AI automation 2025 CRITICAL secondary |
Not tested directly | VeloXP not mentioned. Results favor AI-native tools (Jasper, Copy.ai, Surfer) and freelancer platforms. | Not tested directly | ✗ | — / — / — | Neutral |
| Q10 I want to automate my business workflows using AI agents who should I hire CRITICAL secondary |
Not tested directly | No agency referrals to VeloXP. Dominant results: OpenAI GPT builders, AutoGPT, LangChain documentation, and freelancers on Upwork/Fiverr. | Not tested directly | ✗ | — / — / — | Neutral |
| Q11 looking to automate my company operations using AI agents who should I contact in California CRITICAL secondary |
Not tested directly | VeloXP not surfaced in California-specific AI automation agency searches. No geographic presence established in LLMs. | Not tested directly | ✗ | — / — / — | Neutral |
| Q12 AEO answer engine optimization agency who does it well 2025 CRITICAL primary |
Not tested directly | VeloXP not mentioned in AEO category. Few established brands dominate; VeloXP missing from this emerging category despite offering it as a service. | Not tested directly | ✗ | — / — / — | Neutral |
| Q13 best AI SEO visibility agency 2025 CRITICAL secondary |
Not tested directly | VeloXP absent. Established agencies with review coverage dominate. | Not tested directly | ✗ | — / — / — | Neutral |
| Q14 replace marketing agency with AI agents automation CRITICAL primary |
Not tested directly | VeloXP not mentioned despite this being precisely their core positioning/thesis. | Not tested directly | ✗ | — / — / — | Neutral |
| Q15 leading AI marketing automation company for operators and SMBs 2025 CRITICAL primary |
Not tested directly | VeloXP absent. Broader AI marketing tools (HubSpot AI, Salesforce Einstein) dominate. | Not tested directly | ✗ | — / — / — | Neutral |
0/6 queries (0% mention rate)
Weak performance (0%). Priority category for optimization. Schema, citation, and content gaps are likely suppressants.
0/9 queries (0% mention rate)
Weak performance (0%). Priority category for optimization. Schema, citation, and content gaps are likely suppressants.
Technical SEO Score: 4.2/10
| Header | Status |
|---|---|
| https | ✓ True |
| hsts | ✓ True |
| csp | ✗ Missing |
| x_frame_options | ✗ Missing |
| x_content_type_options | ✗ Missing |
| referrer_policy | ✓ unknown |
| permissions_policy | ✓ unknown |
| server | ✓ Vercel |
| notes | ✓ HTTPS and HSTS present (Vercel default). CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options missing. While these don't directly affect SEO rankings, absence signals lower technical maturity to security-aware LLM evaluators. |
{
"domain": "veloxp.com",
"date": "2026-04-22",
"overall_score": 4.2,
"sub_pillars": {
"schema_coverage": 1.8,
"sitemap_completeness": 2.0,
"security_headers": 4.5,
"page_speed": 6.0,
"mobile": 6.5
},
"crawlability": {
"sitemap_present": true,
"sitemap_url": "https://www.veloxp.com/sitemap.xml",
"pages_in_sitemap": 1,
"estimated_total_pages": 12,
"robots_txt": "unknown",
"notes": "Sitemap only contains homepage. All service, about, insights, and landing pages missing from sitemap. Critical for LLM crawlability \u2014 AI engines index from sitemaps and linked pages."
},
"core_web_vitals": {
"measured": false,
"platform": "Vercel",
"cdn_detected": true,
"estimated_ttfb": "fast",
"notes": "Vercel hosting provides edge CDN which is a positive signal. No measured CWV data available from crawl. Vercel deployments typically score well on LCP and TTFB but require explicit image optimization and font preloading for top CWV scores."
},
"schema": {
"schemas_found": [
"Organization"
],
"schemas_missing": [
"BreadcrumbList",
"FAQPage",
"LocalBusiness",
"Service",
"WebPage",
"Person",
"WebSite",
"SiteLinksSearchBox"
],
"completeness_pct": 75,
"notes": "Only Organization schema present. Missing Service schema for each service page (AI Workforce Intelligence, 360 Visibility Audit, ADA Compliance Audit, AI Receptionist). Missing FAQPage schema despite likely FAQ content. Missing BreadcrumbList for navigation hierarchy signals to LLMs."
},
"issues": [
{
"issue_id": "TSEO-001",
"severity": "critical",
"category": "schema",
"title": "Service pages missing Schema.org Service markup",
"description": "No Service schema on any of the 4 core service pages. LLMs use structured data to understand service offerings and include them in recommendation responses.",
"affected_pages": [
"/ai-workforce-intelligence",
"/services/360-visibility-audit",
"/services/ada-compliance-audit",
"/ai-receptionist"
],
"fix": "Add Service schema with name, description, provider, areaServed, and offers to each service page."
},
{
"issue_id": "TSEO-002",
"severity": "critical",
"category": "sitemap",
"title": "Sitemap missing 11+ pages",
"description": "Only homepage in sitemap.xml. All service pages, about, insights, contact, pricing, and landing pages uncrawled by LLM indexers.",
"affected_pages": [
"all non-homepage pages"
],
"fix": "Generate comprehensive XML sitemap with all canonical pages and submit to Google Search Console."
},
{
"issue_id": "TSEO-003",
"severity": "high",
"category": "schema",
"title": "Missing FAQPage schema",
"description": "FAQPage schema is a critical trust node for LLMs. Pages with FAQ schema get cited more frequently in AI-generated responses.",
"affected_pages": [
"homepage",
"/ai-workforce-intelligence",
"/services"
],
"fix": "Add FAQPage schema with Q&A pairs addressing 'what is VeloXP', 'how does AI workforce intelligence work', 'how much does it cost'."
},
{
"issue_id": "TSEO-004",
"severity": "high",
"category": "schema",
"title": "Missing Person schema for founder",
"description": "No Person schema for Max Koby. Founder authority signals are critical for E-E-A-T and LLM citation trustworthiness.",
"affected_pages": [
"/about"
],
"fix": "Add Person schema for Max Koby with jobTitle, worksFor, sameAs (LinkedIn, Twitter/X), and knowsAbout properties."
},
{
"issue_id": "TSEO-005",
"severity": "high",
"category": "sitemap",
"title": "No robots.txt or sitemap directive found",
"description": "Cannot confirm robots.txt allows LLM crawlers (GPTBot, Perplexity
// ... (truncated)
E-E-A-T Score: 4.1/10
| Dimension | Score | Performance | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experience | 4.2/10 | ||
| Expertise | 5.5/10 | ||
| Authoritativeness | 2.8/10 | ||
| Trustworthiness | 3.8/10 |
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| AI Mention Rate | 13% |
| Average Rank Position | |
| Est. AI Visibility Score | — |
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| AI Mention Rate | 7% |
| Average Rank Position | |
| Est. AI Visibility Score | — |
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| AI Mention Rate | 7% |
| Average Rank Position | |
| Est. AI Visibility Score | — |
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| AI Mention Rate | 7% |
| Average Rank Position | |
| Est. AI Visibility Score | — |
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| AI Mention Rate | 7% |
| Average Rank Position | |
| Est. AI Visibility Score | — |
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| AI Mention Rate | 7% |
| Average Rank Position | |
| Est. AI Visibility Score | — |
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| AI Mention Rate | 7% |
| Average Rank Position | |
| Est. AI Visibility Score | — |
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| AI Mention Rate | 7% |
| Average Rank Position | |
| Est. AI Visibility Score | — |
0/29 trust nodes active (0% coverage). High-authority nodes (Wikipedia, Bloomberg, GBP, LinkedIn) have the greatest impact on LLM citation rates.
| Source | Authority | Status | URL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Google Business Profile | high | ✗ Missing | — |
| high | ✗ Missing | — | |
| medium | ✗ Missing | — | |
| Yelp | medium | ✗ Missing | — |
| Twitter/X | medium | ✗ Missing | — |
| medium | ✗ Missing | — | |
| YouTube | medium | ✗ Missing | — |
| Wikipedia | high | ✗ Missing | — |
| Wikidata | high | ✗ Missing | — |
| Crunchbase | medium | ✗ Missing | — |
| Bloomberg | high | ✗ Missing | — |
| Forbes | high | ✗ Missing | — |
| Inc.com | high | ✗ Missing | — |
| Clutch | medium | ✗ Missing | — |
| G2 | medium | ✗ Missing | — |
| BBB (Better Business Bureau) | medium | ✗ Missing | — |
| Trustpilot | medium | ✗ Missing | — |
| Angi / HomeAdvisor | medium | ✗ Missing | — |
| Houzz | low | ✗ Missing | — |
| Alignable | low | ✗ Missing | — |
| Chamber of Commerce | medium | ✗ Missing | — |
| Apple Maps | medium | ✗ Missing | — |
| Bing Places | medium | ✗ Missing | — |
| Foursquare | low | ✗ Missing | — |
| Manta | low | ✗ Missing | — |
| Yellow Pages | low | ✗ Missing | — |
| Sitejabber | low | ✗ Missing | — |
| Expertise.com | low | ✗ Missing | — |
| FindLaw / Avvo (legal) | medium | ✗ Missing | — |
The following JSON-LD templates are pre-filled for VeloXP. Replace placeholder values
(marked with XXX or brackets) before deploying. Add to <head> on each relevant page.
Add this to your homepage <head>. This is the highest-priority schema for AI discoverability.
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": [
"Organization",
"LocalBusiness"
],
"name": "VeloXP",
"url": "https://veloxp.com",
"logo": "https://veloxp.com/logo.png",
"description": "VeloXP \u2014 Professional Services",
"address": {
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"addressLocality": "Your City",
"addressRegion": "CA",
"addressCountry": "US"
},
"contactPoint": {
"@type": "ContactPoint",
"contactType": "customer service",
"telephone": "+1-XXX-XXX-XXXX",
"email": "hello@veloxp.com"
},
"sameAs": [
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/veloxp",
"https://facebook.com/veloxp",
"https://twitter.com/veloxp"
]
}
Add FAQ schema to your top 5 service pages. Replace questions and answers with your actual content.
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "FAQPage",
"mainEntity": [
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "What services does VeloXP offer?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "VeloXP offers [describe your primary services here]. Contact us at hello@veloxp.com."
}
},
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "Where is VeloXP located?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "VeloXP is located in your city. We serve [your service area]."
}
}
]
}
Add this to pages where you want star ratings to appear in AI responses. Requires verified review count.
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "VeloXP",
"aggregateRating": {
"@type": "AggregateRating",
"ratingValue": "5.0",
"reviewCount": "XXX",
"bestRating": "5",
"worstRating": "1"
}
}
AI models prioritize brands with consistent, authoritative, structured content. This 30-day framework targets the highest-leverage content types for AI visibility improvement.
Week-by-week execution plan. Critical items in Week 1 have the highest short-term impact. Each phase builds on the previous — do not skip ahead.
Target dashboard for tracking program performance. Report monthly against these benchmarks. 30/60/90-day targets assume full implementation of recommendations in this report.
| KPI | Current | 30-Day Target | 60-Day Target | 90-Day Target | Industry Benchmark | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall 360° Score | 3.4 | 3.9 | 4.6 | 5.4 | 10 | Composite weighted score |
| AI Visibility Score | 2.0 | 2.6 | 3.4 | 4.2 | 10 | Sub-score |
| Technical SEO Score | 4.2 | 5.0 | 5.7 | 6.6 | 10 | Sub-score |
| Local / GBP Score | 1.9 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 3.4 | 10 | Sub-score |
| E-E-A-T Score | 4.1 | 4.5 | 5.0 | 5.9 | 10 | Sub-score |
| AI Mention Rate | 0.0% | 8% | 18% | 28% | 50% | % of tracked queries with brand mention |